Reply to: The inaugural CUK brown-noser of the week award ...`

[BrilloPad]

Oh fook orf you toadying toe-rag.

Cretin

[sasguru]

Good to see.

Oh fook orf you toadying toe-rag.

[Freamon]

Actually no, sasguru's infraction was from me, for starting threads to flame others. You had a ban for doing that, because of (more of) a history of trolling behaviour. Have another ban for your hypocritical whingeing though - it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it. Let this be a clear message that the same standards apply to both new and seasoned members of the board.

Good to see.

[SimonMac]

Actually no, sasguru's infraction was from me, for starting threads to flame others. You had a ban for doing that, because of (more of) a history of trolling behaviour. Have another ban for your hypocritical whingeing though - it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it. Let this be a clear message that the same standards apply to both new and seasoned members of the board.

[AtW]

no doubt when school is out and no prefects are around to look after me they will duff me up for being a speccy creep.

They are waiting for you and Churchy at Birdgwater, just off M5...

[Old Greg]

Would it be possible to amend the rules to be no flaming other except Brillo? I really genuinely enjoy the attention - usually everyone just ignores me. I feel like I got MF and then sas into trouble - no doubt when school is out and no prefects are around to look after me they will duff me up for being a speccy creep.

They'll be too busy selling blow jobs to the PE teacher for ciggies.

[BrilloPad]

I've got an infraction for starting this thread

Better make it a good un.

Actually no, sasguru's infraction was from me, for starting threads to flame others. You had a ban for doing that, because of (more of) a history of trolling behaviour. Have another ban for your hypocritical whingeing though - it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it. Let this be a clear message that the same standards apply to both new and seasoned members of the board.

Would it be possible to amend the rules to be no flaming other except Brillo? I really genuinely enjoy the attention - usually everyone just ignores me. I feel like I got MF and then sas into trouble - no doubt when school is out and no prefects are around to look after me they will duff me up for being a speccy creep.

[AtW]

Are you putting up a poll for how long his ban should be ?

Moi?

**** no!

[TestMangler]

Actually no, sasguru's infraction was from me, for starting threads to flame others. You had a ban for doing that, because of (more of) a history of trolling behaviour. Have another ban for your hypocritical whingeing though - it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it. Let this be a clear message that the same standards apply to both new and seasoned members of the board.

Are you putting up a poll for how long his ban should be ?

[AtW]

it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it.

Oh he can take it very well - btw you've just lost your frequent "MF tat stores" shopper discount

[realityhack]

A fooking infraction!!! I got a ban for a simple poll asking people to vote how long a poster should be banned for. Talk about fooking inconsistency and favouritism. You probably got an infraction of a normal mod whereas in the evening you tend to get a drunken Realityhack twiddling a pencil between his fingers and spilling vodka & champagne over his keyboard as he flicks between CUK and Tubegalore.

F**king joke.

Actually no, sasguru's infraction was from me, for starting threads to flame others. You had a ban for doing that, because of (more of) a history of trolling behaviour. Have another ban for your hypocritical whingeing though - it's clear you can dish it, but you can't take it. Let this be a clear message that the same standards apply to both new and seasoned members of the board.

[MarillionFan]

I think its cojak. So its hormones / lack of a shag not Napoleon complexes that will be the issue today.

Lack of a shag? WTF has a sea bird got to do with it???

How do you make a hormone?

[eek]

Oh I'm sure I'll get banned for some other trumped up charge before the end of the evening by some over zealous moderator with a Napoleon complex.

I think its cojak. So its hormones / lack of a shag not Napoleon complexes that will be the issue today.

[eek]

Try it again, I am sure it was a mistake.

+1 are you sure it was because of the poll and not a option within it (I'm sure it was the option not the poll that was the issue).

[MarillionFan]

Try it again, I am sure it was a mistake.

Oh I'm sure I'll get banned for some other trumped up charge before the end of the evening by some over zealous moderator with a Napoleon complex.